MikeTateMath.org

Ψ λ ∞ ∂
Mike Tate Mathematics

Drill down Learning

Δ λ θ σ

Modular Resonance • Drill-Down System ✨

A nested, reader-adaptive lattice of axioms, bridges, propagation, portals, and certificates — now with an interactive orbit map and quick search.
Books: I–VII
Portals: G Q I C A
Nodes: 11 + Core

📚 The Lattice Books (click to unfold)

—
🧠 A: Modular Resonance Framework foundation›

The foundational module introducing how modular, harmonic, and recursive mathematical structures unify the system.

🧭 A1: Conceptual Overview on-ramp›

A guided introduction to the resonance model, designed for readers at all comprehension levels.

🎯 A1a: Purpose ›

Establish a layered structure that accommodates beginners and advanced practitioners via conceptual depth.

🪜 A1b: Reader-Adaptive Structure ›

Each layer expands only when the reader is ready, enabling self-paced modular resonance learning.

🧵 A1c: Recursive Segue Architecture ›

Outer layers lead into deeper modules, ensuring coherence across the knowledge lattice.

🎼 A2: Harmonic Mechanics engine›

Defines harmonic recursion, modular symmetry, and resonance indexing.

📈 A2a: Modular Harmonic Index ›

Aligns modular residues with harmonic frequencies to yield predictive structure.

🧷 A2b: Recursive Stability Operators ›

Maintain balance across layers and prevent drift in modular systems.

🪐 A2c: Resonance Scaling Laws ›

Governs how resonance intensifies or fades across depth layers.

🧪 A3: Applied Modular Resonance uses›

Applications in mathematics, physics, symbolic systems, and content models.

🧑‍🏫 A3a: Educational Layering ›

Nested tiers help readers of all levels access complexity without overwhelm.

🧭 A3b: Integrated Navigation ›

Hyperlinks and transitions adapt to reader curiosity and conceptual flow.

🗺️ A3c: Semantic Harmonic Mapping ›

Readers navigate via meaning clusters instead of linear paths.

📜 Book I — Axioms and Objects axioms›
📐 Postulates 0.2–0.7 (Euclid-style) ›

Postulate 0.2 — Third Frame
All measurements occur in invariant gauge T.

Postulate 0.3 — Variational
Strict convexity; E[ρ] = 0 iff all zeros lie at Re(s) = 1/2.

Postulate 0.4 — Operator
A densely-defined essentially self-adjoint operator T exists.

Postulate 0.5 — Modular Geodesics
Möbius/quaternionic equivariance ⇒ confinement to invariant geodesics.

Postulate 0.6 — Canonical Criteria
Li-positivity & Nyman–Beurling accepted equivalents to RH.

Postulate 0.7 — Certificates
Each analytic inequality paired with a machine-checkable certificate.

🧾 Definitions 1.1–1.3 ›

Definition 1.1 — Third Frame T
Dimensionless log-coordinates; cross-ratio invariants χ.

Definition 1.2 — Variational Energy
\(E[ρ] = \int ||∇Φ||^2 + V(\Reρ)\), with V(x)=0 iff x=1/2.

Definition 1.3 — Operator T
Densely-defined symmetric operator with calibrated map λ↦1/2+iΦ(λ).

🧩 Lemmas 1.4–1.5 ›

Lemma 1.4 — Coercivity & Strict Convexity
Unique minimizer; strict convexity of Dirichlet+potential.

Lemma 1.5 — Essential Self-Adjointness
Deficiency indices (0,0); T has unique self-adjoint extension.

Remark 1.6: Objects fixed here; proofs later do not assume RH.

🌉 Book II — Canonical Bridges bridges›
🔗 Theorem 2.1 — Bridge V ↔ Li ›

Variational infimum E = 0 ⇔ Li-moment positivity.

🔗 Theorem 2.2 — Bridge V ↔ NB ›

Variational infimum = Nyman–Beurling distance = 0.

🎛️ Theorem 2.3 — Bridge O → Critical Line ›

Self-adjoint T ⇒ real spectrum ⇒ mapped zeros lie on Re(s)=1/2.

🌀 Theorem 2.4 — Bridge M → Critical Line ›

Möbius/quaternionic equivariance confines zeros to invariant geodesics.

🧱 Book III — Propagation & Barriers flow›
📏 Definition 3.1 — Monotone Functional M(T) ›

NB-distance or energy slice up to T with explicit tail bounds.

🚫 Lemma 3.2 — No-Escape Monotonicity ›

d/dT M(T) ≥ 0; M(T₀)=0 ⇒ M(T)=0 ∀ T ≥ T₀.

🌊 Lemma 3.3 — Flow Continuation ›

Zeros move continuously; cannot be born off-line without violating convexity/entropy.

🕳️ Theorem 3.4 — Propagation Pigeonhole ›

If certified window holds, either VALID globally or contradiction.

🪟 Book IV — Portals (Geometry, Quantum, Info, Crypto, AI) portals›
🧿 Portal G — Geometry ›

Prop 4.1 — Invariant Geodesics
Prop 4.2 — Cross-Ratio Constancy

⚛️ Portal Q — Operator/Quantum ›

Prop 4.3 — Spectral Theorem Use
Prop 4.4 — Floquet Windows

🧠 Portal I — Information / Entropy ›

Prop 4.5 — Clarity Flow
Prop 4.6 — No Off-Line Minima

🔐 Portal C — Cryptography ›

Def 4.7 — Reversible Layer Stack
Prop 4.8 — Statistical Indistinguishability

🤖 Portal A — AI / Theorem Discovery ›

Def 4.9 — Harmonic Compression Objective

🧾 Book V — Data & Certificates proof-ops›

Decision Table:
VALID if all (V,O,M,L,NB,S) invariants pass; INVALID if any fail.

Certificate JSON specs:
• li.json • nb.json • energy.json • operator.json • geodesic.json

✅ Book VI — Microproofs (Q.E.D.) micro›

Prop 6.1 — Euler–Lagrange at 1/2

Prop 6.2 — Deficiency Indices = 0

Prop 6.3 — Möbius Confinement

🪓 Book VII — Refutation Defenestration stress test›

Sundering Protocol:
SP-1 identify hinge
SP-2 pick bridge
SP-3 reduce to invariant failure
SP-4 present certificate
SP-5 conclude INVALID

Objections A–F with invalidations.